We’re back…and so are those damned aliens! Twenty years after getting their asses kicked by a scrappy (and witty) group of human survivors, the aliens have returned with a really big and nasty ship. They ain’t looking for a cup of sugar. Can another group of even more disadvantaged scrappy survivors, rise up and save the Earth again? Did it really take director, Roland Emmerich, and his team 20 years to come up this storyline? Does the return of Goldblum, Pullman and Spiner, make up for the loss of William (Will) Smith? Was Independence Day: Resurgence a disaster film or a film disaster? We answer all of theses questions and more in episode 74 of The Smoking Screen Podcast. Come and join the circle!
Another week, another super hero film. This time we journey once again into world of Charles Xavier (Professor X) and his school for the really, really, really gifted (X-Men). How does Bryan Singer’s X-Men: Apocalypse stack up against the other X-films and the current batch of comic book inspired blockbusters? James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender were spectacular in the pivotal roles of Prof. X and Magneto, in First Class and Days of Future Past. Could they repeat such strong performances in the final installment of the storyline? Was Oscar Isaac able to create a memorable and menacing super villain in Apocalypse? Are we getting tired of watching these films? How many more of coming out this summer? We answer all of these question and more in episode 73 of The Smoking Screen Podcast. Come and join the circle!
Ryan Gosling and Russell Crowe team up in Shane Black’s new 70s buddy comedy, The Nice Guys. Was this an inspired comedic pairing, like Clint Eastwood and the monkey in Any Which Way But Loose? Or, was it more like J-Lo and Batman in Gigli? (Clearly not, but I really want to make that Affleck/Batman joke). Was the film able to bring something new and fresh to genre? Did Iron Man make an appearance? (More jokes! Black also directed Iron Man 3.) We answer all of these questions and more in episode 72 of The Smoking Screen Podcast. Come and join the circle! (No joke.)
With our boycott of George Clooney’s Money Monster, we looked for something a little less anger inducing to review this week and settled upon Jeremy Saulnier’s Green Room. What’s so bad about being trapped in an isolated location while being hunted down by a murderous gang of skinheads? Still better than Clooney. Patrick Stewart plays the gang’s leader in the film, but does he achieve a sense of menace or just a ill-tempered version of Captain Jean-Luc Picard? Speaking of Star Trek, the movie also stars Anton Yelchin, who plays Chekov, in the Trek reboot. But, the big question, with any horror film is: how scary was it? We answer all of these question and more in episode 71 of The Smoking Screen Podcast. Come and join the circle!
Review or Boycott?
The Tricky Politics of Money Monster
When choosing which films to review on our show, it is usually a very simple process. We pick movies that people want to see, have already seen or are in some way uniquely positioned for our audience. Politics have never play a role in our decision – until now.
This should have been a very easy decision. Money Monster opened to over 3,000 screens, Hollywood A-lister George Clooney stars beside Julia Roberts and financial sector corruption/conspiracy is a very hot topic these days. It is also directed by multi-talented Jodie Foster. We already reviewed the main box-office competition, Captain America: Civil War and The Jungle Book.
Between the first trailer in January (when we were very excited about the film), and its release this weekend, a funny thing happened: Hillary Clinton.
Anyone who listens to our show knows how much love, admiration and respect we have for Sen. Bernie Sanders. His views on a moral economy, healthcare for all, equality and education are clearly the way to a better future for all Americans. The average campaign contribution of $27 demonstrates that everyday people are behind his cause. On his behalf, we have phonebanked, facebanked, designed shareable social media images and brainstormed anything else we could think of to help the cause. We are proudly “Burners for Bernie” and air a short update segment on the primary race each week on the show.
Observing the nomination process closely for several months now, it is no secret that Sanders is fighting an entrenched and inflexible Democratic establishment along with their big money donors every step of the way. The corporate media has actively worked against the campaign by providing minimal coverage, routinely suggesting that he should drop out of the race and touting Clinton’s inevitability. The tornado of voter suppression, election fraud and unbudging superdelegates are making this electoral process feel less like the will of the people (democracy), rather the will of those in power.
Of concern is the striking confluence of the film's narrative with George Clooney's recent and highly-publicized fundraising efforts on behalf of Hillary Clinton.
A quick refresher:
- The weekend of April 15th, George and Amal Clooney hosted two $33,400 a plate fundraisers for Clinton. For a mere $343,500 you could even pay to sit at the head table with Clinton and the Clooneys.
- “Both events raised money for the Hillary Victory Fund. The maximum donation to a presidential campaign is $2,700 for the primary elections (plus another $2,700 for the general), the Hillary Victory Fund can accept much larger contributions because it is a so-called joint fundraising committee that is comprised of multiple committees.” (1)
- These combined events, involving relatively few people, raised an estimated $15 million for Hillary’s Super PAC. Remember, Clinton claims to be against Citizens United, which allows this gross subversion of campaign finance laws to take place.
- After mounting public pressure about “big money” and closed-door events, Clooney gave an interview to Chuck Todd (Meet The Press), where he justified the obscene amount of money involved by saying:
Turns out George was wrong.
- “Less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by the Hillary Victory Fund has stayed in the state parties’ coffers, according to a POLITICO analysis of the latest Federal Election Commission filings.” (2) The vast majority of the money was recycled (laundered?) directly back into Clinton’s campaign.
Getting back to Money Monster, it is difficult to know if Clooney believed what he was saying or was misled along with so many others by the dark side of Clinton’s campaign. He is certainly free to support and believe whomever he wants. However, the irony is a bit too rich for our blood.
Clooney has played a central role in giving Clinton access to those with significant wealth and power. These events concern us as much as all the other special interests giving millions upon millions of dollars to her campaign. This includes Wall Street, fossil fuels, big pharma and private prisons. Are we really to believe they expect nothing in return?
Starring in a film tackling financial corruption while at the same time "hosting" shady campaign fundraising events is perplexing, hypocritical and just outright wrong.
For this reason, dear listeners, we will not review Money Monster on The Smoking Screen Podcast. While George Clooney was not the only person working on the film, he is the star, face and spokesperson. Instead, we have chosen to donate the cost of our tickets to the Sanders campaign.